Reeds or Flywheel weight?

Emily · Feb 11, 2012

I'd re-gear before I got a FWW. I think Reeds>FWW but personally I wouldn't get reeds either.

Mojavekid18 · Feb 12, 2012

just buy one and talk about returning it for the other one for 3 months, it would be so orgina.......oh wait, nevermind :smirk:

2smoke · Feb 12, 2012

Well youve already got the bike set up with a good pipe. Id say go with the reeds. Either way your gonna have to relearn the bike. Not to mention that the reeds are an easy swap, compared to doing steel clutch plates or the FWW. Truth fully if you could really afford to do it and if you can find one for your bike. I would go with the Boyesen RAD valve. That will really breathe ALOT of life into your bike especially on the bottom end to mid range. Just my 2Cents.

Mihylo33 · Feb 12, 2012

Nighthawk016:
PD only goes up to 51 on rear, and stock gearing is like 13/49

at most drop 1 on the front with the reeds and it will be a totally different bike

Naturaledge · Feb 12, 2012

Have you thought about just buying a siiiiickk graffix kit? Pure gold right there. You're welcome.

Nighthawk016 · Feb 12, 2012

thanks for the input guys, I have the thread set up to let everyone vote for 2 weeks, whichever one has the most votes at the end of the 2 weeks is what im getting. As if right now it looks like ill be getting reeds.

Nighthawk016 · Feb 12, 2012

Mihylo33:
at most drop 1 on the front with the reeds and it will be a totally different bike

I also have a 53 tooth gear available to me, but I would need a longer chain to get it to work, right now im about 2 links short of making it work and not hit my chain slider

14D · Feb 12, 2012

I'd get a fww, more bang for the buck for woods riding. Than get the reeds later.

Also, why is Ray in this thread? Is he trying to troll every 2t thread now or something?

yamadogyz · Feb 12, 2012

140rider:
I'd get a fww, more bang for the buck for woods riding. Than get the reeds later.

Also, why is Ray in this thread? Is he trying to troll every 2t thread now or something?

Dude, seriously. I just wrote what I heard, and labeled it that way. You even voted same as myself^ I don't know what's up with you all in your 2 stroke, Klan club but it's annoying. 2 strokes aren't the :bleep:

god of motocross, if they were the Pro AMA would still run them. Simple enough? Off my ass. This is all I have to say.

josmoloco · Feb 12, 2012

yamadogyz:
Dude, seriously. I just wrote what I heard, and labeled it that way. You even voted same as myself^ I don't know what's up with you all in your 2 stroke, Klan club but it's annoying. 2 strokes aren't the god of motocross, if they were the Pro AMA would still run them. Simple enough? Off my ass. This is all I have to say.

This is not a thread about mx :picard:

14D · Feb 12, 2012

yamadogyz:
Dude, seriously. I just wrote what I heard, and labeled it that way. You even voted same as myself^ I don't know what's up with you all in your 2 stroke, Klan club but it's annoying. 2 strokes aren't the god of motocross, if they were the Pro AMA would still run them. Simple enough? Off my ass. This is all I have to say.

I was just noting that you seem to be poking into allot of 2smoke threads :smirk:

Also, they are. It's just that 250cc bikes are made to compete with 450cc bikes. Do the math.

U mad bro?

josmoloco · Feb 12, 2012

140rider:
I was just noting that you seem to be poking into allot of 2smoke threads

Also, they are. It's just that 250cc bikes are made to compete with 450cc bikes. Do the math.

U mad bro?