Forums
New posts
Search forums
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Off Topic
Off Topic Discussions
AR-15 build
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CDA JR" data-source="post: 126429" data-attributes="member: 837"><p>um there are little differences between them. the afg like james explained above in the aritcle^^ is properly placed as far forward as possible, this will lead to better accuracy and control of the gun when firring rapidly. the downfall of this is that your arms are extended out farther, which will hinder maneuvarbillity. you probably will never see a afg in a combat zone becuase the foregrip like you asked is ment to be placed as far back to the gun mag as possible without hindering mag wile changing mag's. when you place it far back like that you lose accuracy control when relocating a target for a fallow up shot, but the up side is it helps the handler have far more control over the gun. since your arms are closer together. hence why the military, navy seal, police, ect issue foregrips not afgs. have you ever seen a paintballer play speed ball?? there are reasons why the guns are so small, and have there arms closer together its for better handling. plus in combat conditions MOST people dont really aim but point and shoot, but this is all basically opionon from different forms and articles and my own personal testing. also i am more than welcome to hear your guys opionons on this also please.</p><p> </p><p>like when i get certified to used my ar-15 in the line of duty i will put a forward grip on mine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CDA JR, post: 126429, member: 837"] um there are little differences between them. the afg like james explained above in the aritcle^^ is properly placed as far forward as possible, this will lead to better accuracy and control of the gun when firring rapidly. the downfall of this is that your arms are extended out farther, which will hinder maneuvarbillity. you probably will never see a afg in a combat zone becuase the foregrip like you asked is ment to be placed as far back to the gun mag as possible without hindering mag wile changing mag's. when you place it far back like that you lose accuracy control when relocating a target for a fallow up shot, but the up side is it helps the handler have far more control over the gun. since your arms are closer together. hence why the military, navy seal, police, ect issue foregrips not afgs. have you ever seen a paintballer play speed ball?? there are reasons why the guns are so small, and have there arms closer together its for better handling. plus in combat conditions MOST people dont really aim but point and shoot, but this is all basically opionon from different forms and articles and my own personal testing. also i am more than welcome to hear your guys opionons on this also please. like when i get certified to used my ar-15 in the line of duty i will put a forward grip on mine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Off Topic
Off Topic Discussions
AR-15 build
Top