I read the whole thing and it was so back and forth and seemed not to make clear decision on any certain thing. Almost like a politician wrote it. Softer shells for were better than the harder shells for lower impacts and but harder where better for catastrophic wrecks. I am still on the fence as to what helmet would be better. I mean you go buy a $400 helmet and have a small speed get off, and you are worse off than having a Tractor supply helmet. I know that you can have one with Kevlar and all that jazz but the minute you drop it it is toast and as far as I can tell the lower cost ones are rated still at 300g's and that it still holding up to way better than that of a 80g hit that of two monster line backers colliding at full speed on a football field
.
.
I was getting the same feel from it, like how they said price has nothing to do with protection, but that it's more about a good fitting helmet. Yet in the next paragraph they talked about what a higher priced helmet provides and one of the things is "a better fit". Umm so a higher priced helmet that fits better doesn't provide more protection because it costs more?

:throwshandsintheair: I give up, from now on I'm just going to buy the sickest looking helmet and be done with it. 


I know, I know, it's not safe, and I'm trying to replace it. BUT, since I don't know if I should buy a cheap helmet or an expensive helmet, I'm going in the middle and buying a $150-$200 helmet.