Now I know if you want real bottom - mid power you need a 450 .. But I havn't had enough experience to go to a 450 yet, so I'm staying with 250s. But I do love bottom punch and grunt, so can anyone finally finish the dispute as to which 250 motocrosser has the best usable bottom end for both 2010 and 2011, apart from the Yamaha because apparently they are not particullarily fast..
go with Yamaha... the only reason they're not fast is that they make them bullet proof instead of making them with power you'll never use.
yeah i've got a 07 WR450 thats seen probably 2,000 miles of wide open in the sand and another 2,000 miles wide open in the dez... then a 99 WR400 thats seen God knows how many miles on it and nither has been rebuilt
all of the 250f's go about the same speed (+/- 5-6Kph) its the the way the power is applied, yamaha's are known for good smooth power delivery with good low end, but to do this they sacrifice 2-3HP and everyone always whines that yamaha puts out the least HP, but like many have told you, pick a color and twist the throttle. Suz's are known for handling Kawi's are known for their fairly violent top end pull Honda's are known for their valve eating powers but are usually a decent all around bikes
